Raul can do a piece of work in 20 days and Kate in 25 days. They work together for 5 days and then Kate leaves. In how many more days would Raul finish the work?
Raul can do a piece of work in 20 days So, this means Raul works at the rate of = 1 ÷ 20 = 0.05 per day (equivalent of 5% per day)
and Kate in 25 days and Kate works at the rate of = 1 ÷ 25 = 0.04 per day (equivalent of 4% per day)
They work together for 5 days and then Kate leaves The percentage of work completed in that 5 days is (5% * 5) + (4% * 5) = 45% (or 0.45)
Remaining work = 100% - 45% = 55%
So, Raul does 5% of work per day and has 55% of work to complete, that will take him: 55% ÷ 5% = 11 days to complete
Raul can do a piece of work in 20 days and Kate in 25 days. They work together for 5 days and then Kate leaves. In how many more days would Raul finish the work?
Raul can do a piece of work in 20 days So, this means Raul works at the rate of = 1 ÷ 20 = 0.05 per day (equivalent of 5% per day)
and Kate in 25 days and Kate works at the rate of = 1 ÷ 25 = 0.04 per day (equivalent of 4% per day)
They work together for 5 days and then Kate leaves The percentage of work completed in that 5 days is (5% * 5) + (4% * 5) = 45% (or 0.45)
Remaining work = 100% - 45% = 55%
So, Raul does 5% of work per day and has 55% of work to complete, that will take him: 55% ÷ 5% = 11 days to complete
Answer: 11 days
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
The Singapore stock market has alternated between positive and negative finishes through the last five trading days since the end of the two-day winning streak in which it had added more than a dozen points or 0.4 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just above the 3,060-point plateau and it's likely to see a narrow trading range on Monday.
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
